Delhi’s Patiala House Court has rejects the bail plea of Alt News co-founder and prominent Muslim journalist Mohammed Zubair, and grants 14-day Judicial custody.
Zubair was produced before Chief Metropolitan Magistrate Snigdha Savaria following the expiration of his four-day police custody.
Police have moved the court for a 14-day judicial custody application, whereas Zubair has moved the court for the bail application.
Meanwhile Zubair’s lawyer told media in court that the Delhi Police has leaked information about the order on his bail plea even before the court came back from lunch and pronounced it.
“I had a word with my Investigation Officer, I misheard it due to noise and inadvertently the message was posted in the broadcast,” IFSO DCP KPS Malhotra said about the leaked bail plea information.
In another development, Delhi Police added criminal conspiracy, and destruction of evidence charges against AltNews co-founder Mohammed Zubair and 35 of FCRA.
Opposing the bail application of Alt News co-founder Mohammad Zubair, the prosecution has submitted before the court that they are investigating donations allegedly received by him from several foreign countries such as Pakistan.
“If you accept something – donation, etc from a person of foreign country – then it’s a contravention. As per our CDR analysis, he has accepted through Razor gateway, from Pakistan, Syria, etc which all things require further investigation,” Additional Public Prosecutor Atul Shrivastava argued.
Zubair’s lawyer Grover argued that the police had misled the court as they made a submission in court that Zubair received the funds but in their statement mentioned the company, Pravda.
She argued that the investigation has to be to prosecute a crime and not harass or bismerch someone.
“Pravda is a section 8 company. Funds are going as per their update. See if there is one financial transaction of a foreign company. This power is not given to mislead the court. Throw something in the media to say ‘oh something is happening’. Say that foreign money is there. All transactions are proved. These are financial transactions. How can they make a submission (that) it has gone into my account?,” she submitted.
“A company taking funds is not a violation of FCRA. You have not issued notice to Pravda. You said the journalist took (funds) and then said Pravda. Facts have been muddied up. This is why we need a fact checker in this country,” she argued.
“The entire exercise is mala fide in nature and is a non prosecutable action of FIR,” said Grover.