Wednesday, January 14, 2026

Environmental racism enabled forty years of injustice for survivors of Bhopal gas tragedy: Amnesty

Bhopal Medical Appeal, Martin Stott

For the past four decades, a woefully inadequate and callous response towards the victims and survivors of the Bhopal gas tragedy has been enabled by environmental racism, Amnesty International said on the 40th anniversary of one of the world’s worst industrial disasters.

At about midnight on 2 December 1984, a leak of about 40 tonnes of lethal Methyl Isocyanate gas (MIC) from the pesticide plant in Bhopal, then owned by US-based Union Carbide Corporation, quickly killed thousands of people living in informal housing around the plant.

It is estimated that more than 22,000 people have died prematurely as a direct result of exposure to the gas, with deaths continuing to occur. More than 500,000 were injured or have suffered permanent harm, including through the inter-generational impact of MIC exposure on reproductive health, and water sources contaminated by chemicals left on the site.

Since then, Bhopal has been a ‘sacrifice zone’ for the US-based chemical company Union Carbide Corporation (UCC), and its later owner the Dow Chemical Company (Dow), as well as the US and Indian authorities, in which half a million people across multiple generations continue to suffer, Amnesty said.

“Little has changed in the past forty years. Unequal power dynamics have ensured that justice is denied to the victims, who predominantly belonged to low-income, marginalized and minority communities. Meanwhile, those responsible, especially giant US-based companies, shamefully continue to evade their clear human rights responsibilities. The Indian and US authorities’ failure to hold to account all those responsible for this outrageous crime of corporate negligence is a travesty,” said Mark Dummett, Amnesty International’s Head of Business and Human Rights.

Thousands of tonnes of toxic waste remain buried in and around the abandoned plant, leading to ongoing and expanding water pollution. This indicates the area being a ‘sacrifice zone’ – an area so severely polluted or contaminated that it has demonstrable and devastating consequences on the health of local inhabitants.

Dow, one of the world’s largest chemical companies, in 2001 purchased UCC, the US-based company that had majority-owned the Bhopal plant at the time of the 1984 disaster. Dow took full control of UCC’s assets and benefits, and thereby, it should have also absorbed its liabilities. Instead, Dow has constantly distanced itself from any responsibility towards survivors.

The human rights group noted that in 1989, UCC made a wholly unfair and inadequate compensation settlement with the Government of India, which was agreed to without consulting the Bhopal survivors.

“Moreover, lobbying and pressure from the US government has ensured that American nationals and companies responsible for the disaster have escaped criminal justice,” the statement read.

Earlier this year, Amnesty International released Bhopal 40 Years of Injustice, a report documenting how entrenched environmental racism, through systemic and intergenerational discrimination, has enabled the lack of accountability of both state and corporate actors and the failure to ensure a comprehensive reparations programme.

The report identifies environmental racism as numerous interconnected human rights violations which include the adverse impacts of environmental degradation on the rights to life, health, an adequate standard of living, education and other substantive rights, the encroachment on the right to a clean, healthy and sustainable environment, and the violation of the right to freedom from discrimination.

Amnesty International has asked shareholders to end their relationship with Dow and consider withdrawing their investment from the chemicals company if it fails to take meaningful and rapid action to address the suffering through adequate compensation for all survivors and contamination assessment and clean-up.

The group also urged the Indian government to continue to seek legal remedy from Dow on behalf of the victims and make up for any shortfall for those still suffering, or wrongly denied redress.

spot_img

Don't Miss

Related Articles