Topic: Khalid Saifi
After 6 years in prison, Khalid Saifi’s travel business finds life again through his wife, fellow former political prisoner
As Khalid Saifi remains behind bars, his wife Nargis Saifi steps beyond her private world to revive his abandoned travel business, alongside former political prisoner Asif Iqbal Tanha, to keep their families afloat.
From Tasleem’s little daughter to Gulfisha’s elderly parents, families march with JNU students for release of anti-CAA prisoners
The march, held on the day marking Umar Khalid’s five years in jail, began at Ganga Dhaba and concluded at Sabarmati Dhaba, and was attended by the families of the jailed activists- from the young daughter of Tasleem Khan to the elderly parents of Gulfisha Fatima and Shadab Khan.
‘Got files late night’: Supreme Court adjourns hearing of bail pleas of anti-CAA activists to September 19
The Supreme Court on Friday adjourned the hearing of bail petitions moved by anti-CAA activists Umar Khalid, Sharjeel Imam, Gulfisha Fatima and Meeran Haider in a case registered under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA) in connection with the alleged conspiracy behind the February 2020 pogrom in Delhi.
“Small relief, but only acquittal will bring joy,” says wife of anti-CAA activist Khalid Saifi on his 10-day bail after 5 years in jail
Human rights activist Khalid Saifi, incarcerated under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA), has been granted 10 days’ interim bail by Delhi’s Karkardooma Court, Saifi’s partner Nargis Saifi told Maktoob.
Human rights activist Khalid Saifi shares iftar with family during brief parole after 5 years in jail under UAPA
Human rights activist Khalid Saifi, jailed for the past five years under the stringent Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA), was granted a few hours...
“Been in jail for 5 years, booked under UAPA over ‘innocuous messages’: Khalid Saifi tells Delhi HC, asks for bail
Delhi pogrom conspiracy case accused and human rights defender Khalid Saifi on Tuesday questioned the Delhi High Court on whether “innocuous messages” could justify charges under the draconian Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA) and be a reason to deny him bail.
