Thursday, May 2, 2024

“Fundamentalist Muslim cannot be equated with extremist or separatist”: J&K High Court

“A fundamentalist Muslim cannot be equated with an extremist or a separatist,” the Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh High Court observed while dealing with a petition challenging preventive detention of a 22 years old Muslim man inter alia on the ground that he has become a “hard core fundamentalist” and voluntarily agreed to work as Over Ground Worker of the TRF (The Resistance Front), alleged LeT outfit, Live Law reported.

“The usage of the phrase “fundamentalist ideology” by the District Magistrate, does not necessarily mean that the detenue possess an extremist or separatist ideology. The Oxford „Fundamentalist ideology” is part and parcel of the Abrahamic faith where the adherents have to necessarily believe in 4 certain fundamentals of the religion to be accepted as the adherents of that religion. Therefore, someone who steadfastly pursues or follows the fundamentals of an Abrahamic faith, is undoubtedly a fundamentalist but there is no negativity associated with it and it is distinct from an extremist or a separatist,” said Justice Atul Sreedharan.

The HC said: “Fundamentalist an adherent of fundamentalism” pertaining to a Muslim who is a fundamentalist is merely someone who believes in the fundamentals of Islam and steadfastly pursues the same. It cannot have a negative bearing on his personality. The same is as a fundamentalist Muslim cannot be equated with an extremist or a separatist. Therefore, the said ground also is vague and has been used lucidly without proper understanding.”

An argument presented by the Muslim youth, Shahbaz Ahmad Palla, was that the grounds of detention were vague, non-specific, and based on speculations and conjectures, Live Law reported.

The court agreed with this contention and noted that the grounds failed to provide specific details regarding the date and nature of the alleged acts prejudicial to the nation. Moreover, the court found that there was no statement from any witness making direct allegations against the detenu.

In view of the same, the bench quashed the detention order and directed that detenu be set at liberty forthwith, according to Live Law report.

spot_img

Don't Miss

Related Articles